![]() |
| HK Labour Department office in Sheung Wan |
Hong Kong has continued
to keep track of suspected “job hoppers” among foreign domestic helpers (FDHs),
and has so far rejected the visa applications of 96 of them for this year alone, according to
Labour Secretary Chris Sun in a question-and-answer session at the Legislative
Council on Wednesday.
The total number of rejections is already higher by three than the total figure recorded for the whole of 2025.
![]() |
| Basahin ang detalye! |
Another 69 applications were withdrawn after Immigration initiated an investigation of 902 complaints made so far this year.
“Job hopping” is the term commonly used to refer to FDHs who prematurely terminate their contracts to change employers.
![]() |
| Sun says all suspected job-hopping cases are referred to a special team at Immigration |
Statistics provided by Sun showed that over the past three years (as of October 2026), a special duties team at Immigration investigated 3,303 employment visa applications from FDHs suspected of job-hopping. Of these, 455 applications were ultimately rejected while 259 were withdrawn by applicants or could not be followed up.
The investigation team formed in June 2013 is tasked consider a number of factors in looking into suspected job-hopping cases, including the conduct of the FDHs, records of the FDHs and their former employers, and the reported reasons for premature termination of employment contracts.
According to Sun, case officers from the team will also, when necessary, contact the former employers and the applicants to verify the reasons for premature termination of contracts.
“For FDHs suspected of "job-hopping", the ImmD will decisively refuse their employment visa applications and ask them to leave Hong Kong. The ImmD will also retain their application records and take them into account when vetting future applications from the FDHs concerned for employment visas or extension of stay,” said Sun.
He was responding to questions raised by legislator Augustine Wong who also wanted to know if the Government would consider requiring employment agencies to bear the high cost of hiring a FDH on a pro-rata basis, when the helper terminates their contract without cause within three to six months.
Sun’s reply to this was that the Employment Agencies Code of Practice already provides that EAs are required to clearly state whether, in case of premature termination, they will provide a refund, arrange a replacement FDH or make other arrangements, and whether additional fees will be charged.
Employers are urged to look closely into the service agreement offered by EAs so they can make an informed choice on who they should be dealing with according to their needs.
Intermediaries that fail to comply with their undertaking under the Code may have their licenses revoked or renewal refused by the Labour Department, or be told to rectify their action.

















.jpg)






