![]() |
| The trial hearing will resume on April 17 |
A local housewife faced intense questioning at Eastern Court on Tuesday over her claim that a Filipina who used to work for her as a domestic helper had secretly taken a photo while she was taking a bath after a drunken spree.
The employer who testified behind a partition and
was referred to only as “X,” had told the court that Geraldine M. Albarico a
42-year-old wife and mother whom she sacked in early 2024, had surreptitiously
taken a picture showing one of X's breasts as she lay in the bathtub.
X, who is 45 years old, said she had just gone home at past midnight on that day after getting drunk during an outing with her husband and some friends.
She got so drunk she became incontinent and had to wash up on arriving home.
She claimed Albarico was in the bathroom giving her 10-year-old son a bath when
she got in.
X alleged that after taking the nude photo with the phone
she was lent for family chats, Albarico sent it to her Philippine number. X said she
came to know about this only when she began scrolling through the photos in the
phone about four to five months after sacking the helper.
By then, Albarico had already started working for a
new employer in Hong Kong. She was about to fly back to the Philippines for a short
vacation to attend her son’s graduation when she was detained at Hong Kong
Airport as a result of X’s complaint.
On cross-examination, Albrarico’s lawyer put it to X
that no such photo existed because if it did, she would have shown it to the
police when she filed her complaint against her former maid.
“You did not take it to the police because such a
photo did not exist,” said the lawyer. “Either you’re making things up or your
memory was bad.” X disagreed.
The lawyer also suggested to X that the reason she made
up the allegation was because Albarico refused to sign another contract with
her, despite her salary being raised from $6,000 to $6,500 a month. When she
declined to renew, X terminated their contract with only two months to go.
X again disagreed, saying the reason she terminated
the contract was because of the helper’s poor performance and dishonesty. “There
were items that went missing and we suspected that she stole them,” X said.
To this, the lawyer immediately said, “But you did
not report that to the police despite having already filed a complaint against
her?”
X said it was because it was a totally different
matter from what she had complained about.
| Geraldine tells a friend how she used to wash and scrub X's hair |
The court heard that there were about 500 photos in
the family phone, mostly showing Albarico washing X’s hair and applying oil on her
scalp, as well as performing “gua sha” – a traditional Chinese method of
healing that involves scraping the skin – on the employer.
Among these photos was one that partly showed X’s
buttocks and was taken from behind while Albarico was performing one of such
chores. But as the defense lawyer pointed out, there was no photo that showed X’s left breast, which
she used to support her allegations against Abarico.
X's complaint led prosecutors to file a case of
voyeurism against Albarico, an act contrary to section 159AAB (1) and (3) of
the Crimes Ordinance.
However, the charge sheet did not state the exact
date and nature of the alleged offence, saying it happened on an unknown date between Sept
1, 2023 and Feb 25, 2024 inside the bathroom of a flat in La Marina, Aberdeen.
Albarico is charged
with having “surreptitiously recorded Female X in a place in which the said
Female X could reasonably be expected to be nude, to reveal an intimate part,
or to be doing an intimate act, and the said Female X was in circumstances that
gave rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the said (Albarico)
disregarded whether the said Female X consented to being recorded.”
The part-heard case that was originally set to wrap up in one day will resume on April 17, during
which Albarico is set to testify in her defense.





















